WORKSHOP II-A Course Evaluation - 800 Gambler

PRESENTER: Christopher P. Hansford (WORKSHOP II-A)

DATE: Friday, September 25, 2020

COURSE TITLE: “Loot Boxes – Understanding a Phenomenon that Has Already Arrived and How to Respond”

COURSE DETAILS: 10:45 – 12:15 pm 1.5 CE hr

PLEASE RATE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS USING THIS FOUR-POINT SCALE:

1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent) How would you rate this course in terms of ....
Name*
First Last
Email*
Overall quality of course?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Development of personal skills?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Achievement of course objectives at end of workshop – Participant will be able to:
Illustrate a primer on video game loot boxes*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Describe context for educational government affairs engagement in New Jersey*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Create a targeted call to action around government affairs in collaboration with the NJ Council’s team objectives*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Increased knowledge of topic area?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Effectiveness of course design (flow of presentation)?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Overall satisfaction with course presentation?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Course appropriate to participant’s education experience and licensure level?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Relevance to practice and currency of information?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
How would you rate the presenter’s....
Organization of course design?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Style of presentation?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Enthusiasm?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Ability to create an atmosphere conducive to learning?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Ability to encourage participation from attendees?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Timeline of the course?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Adherence to the advertised time?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Overall ability to train in this topic area?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Knowledge of subject matter, and responsiveness to participants?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Was subject matter presented effectively and clearly?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Ability to utilize course-appropriate technology to support participant learning?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
Suitability and usefulness of instructional materials?*
1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)
What did you find most helpful in this course?*
What would you like to see changed in this course?*
Name of Evaluator (mandatory for Social Work credit)*
Comments
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

PLEASE RATE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS USING THIS FOUR-POINT SCALE:

1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent) How would you rate this course in terms of ....

Achievement of course objectives at end of workshop – Participant will be able to:

How would you rate the presenter’s....